01 — Research
I started with what I could measure cheaply: an audit of the existing site, four weeks of attendance records, and 11 conversations with members across freshman, junior, and grad-student cohorts. I wanted to know not just whether students were showing up, but where they fell off the funnel.
Three patterns kept surfacing: students learned about events 24–48 hours too late; nobody trusted the dates because the site contradicted itself; and the people running the chapter felt invisible — there was no easy way to know who to ask about the robotics workshop versus the resume night.
- 11 semi-structured interviews · 4 stakeholder conversations
- Heuristic audit of the existing site against Nielsen's 10
- Two-week diary study with 6 active members
- Competitive teardown of 7 peer chapters' sites